Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, Y.-H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Rusbult, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Commitment to Dating Relationships and Cross-Sex Friendships in America and China

Yuan-Huei W. Lin

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Caryl E. Rusbult

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

A cross-sectional survey study examined commitment processes in the dating relationships and cross-sex friendships of young adults residing in the United States or Taiwan. Feelings of commitment were stronger in relationships with greater satisfaction, poorer quality alternatives, greater investment size and greater centrality of relationship. However, there was little evidence that commitment was influenced by normative support for a relationship. The relationship between commitment and satisfaction was stronger for dating relationships than for friendships, as was the relationship between commitment and alternatives. Dispositions appeared to affect commitment primarily in indirect ways. For example, self-esteem, psychological femininity and perspective-taking were associated with features of interdependence such as perceived alternative quality or willingness to invest, which in turn were related to feelings of commitment. Finally, Americans reported weaker commitment than would be expected given other features of their interdependence with partners. The port and extend the generalizability of Rusbult's investment model.

Key Words: commitment in relationships • cross-sex friendships • dating • relationships • Rusbult's investment model

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 12, No. 1, 7-26 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0265407595121002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
S. O. Gaines Jr., M. Ramkissoon, and B. K. Matthies
Cultural Value Orientations and Accommodation among Heterosexual Relationships in Jamaica
Journal of Black Psychology, May 1, 2003; 29(2): 165 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
H. M. Reeder
'I Like you... as a Friend': The Role of Attraction in Cross-Sex Friendship
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1, 2000; 17(3): 329 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
J. Fitzpatrick and D. L. Sollie
Unrealistic Gendered and Relationship-Specific Beliefs: Contributions to Investments and Commitment in Dating Relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 1999; 16(6): 852 - 867.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
R. A.R. Gurung and T. Duong
Mixing and Matching: Assessing the Concomitants of Mixed-Ethnic Relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 1999; 16(5): 639 - 657.
[Abstract] [PDF]